[DECORATIVE]

Access to Cala Castell: How Pollenca Mediates Between Law, Conservation and Hiking

The Camí de Ternelles leads to the secluded Cala Castell but has been effectively closed since 2018. Mayor Martí March is negotiating with landowners — yet legal restrictions and protected zones make a solution complicated.

Access to Cala Castell: How Pollenca Mediates Between Law, Conservation and Hiking

Access to Cala Castell: How Pollenca Mediates Between Law, Conservation and Hiking

Guiding question: How can the historic path from Ternelles to the Bay of Castell be permanently opened without violating property rights or overwhelming sensitive nature?

Background and a patchwork of legal rules

The path that locals have used for generations has long been caught between private ownership and public right of way. The municipality of Pollenca registered the Camí de Ternelles in its list of public paths in 2008. The then-owners objected; courts later determined that the path is formally privately owned, while at the same time an easement in favor of the public could exist that allows access to the sea. Despite this legal core, the matter stalled: since 2018 the passage has in practice not been freely usable, a situation comparable to the closed GR‑221 section in Sóller.

Why a legal victory does not automatically mean free access

The issue is not purely about ownership. Court rulings and subsequent instructions required the municipality to adapt its planning documents — among other reasons because two protected zones within the property were designated for scientific use only. Such restricted areas, already established in 2007, create a legal barrier to an unrestricted opening of the path.

What has been tried so far

The city administration reacted to the ruling by issuing time-limited access permits and commissioning an environmental assessment from the University of the Balearic Islands. From this caution came an upper limit: a maximum of 20 permitted passages per day, accompanied by rules to protect flora and fauna, a precaution similar to debates about the East Mallorca GR 226 long-distance trail. At the same time, access is currently controlled by a foundation focused on conservation, which has therefore so far prohibited regular passage.

What is often missing from the public debate

There is much talk about 'public ways' and 'private ownership', but rarely about daily implementation: Who should manage visitor flows? How will compliance with time slots and paths be monitored? How will residents and landowners be compensated when usage rights are restricted? The debate needs fewer slogans and more practical answers — on signage systems, guided services and financial incentives for owners. Comparable access controversies are under investigation at Playa de Formentor.

An everyday scene from Pollenca

On a cool morning at the Plaça Major you meet a woman in hiking shoes who is buying bread and olives at the market before starting the Tramuntana ascent. In the distance you can hear the rustle of the pines and the occasional barking of a dog from a finca on the town's edge. For her the Camí de Ternelles is not just a route but a piece of everyday life — a short way to peace that many miss. Such small stories show why a solution must be more than a legal act.

Concrete solution approaches

A workable agreement could combine several elements: first, time-limited, seasonal openings with a daily cap based on the environmental study results. Second, a binding pact with the owners that provides financial compensation or tax incentives if certain conditions are met. Third, a digital permit system with clear registration and control mechanisms to manage visitor numbers and document violations. Fourth, long-term measures like a maintenance and monitoring contract taken on by the municipality or a conservation body so that restricted zones are scientifically managed rather than simply sealed off.

Why negotiations are needed, not just courts

Courts can establish rights; they cannot easily organize daily practice. The ongoing talks by Mayor Martí March with the landowners aim precisely at that: a normalization based on concrete rules and compensations. Only a negotiated solution stands a chance of lasting because it relies on acceptance rather than permanent confrontation.

Concise conclusion

Cala Castell is one of the quiet corners of the northwest that many miss. Restoring a path should not be staged as a victory over owners but as an agreement that protects nature, respects property and restores local access. Practical visitor management, transparent compensation and scientific monitoring are the ingredients from which such an accord can arise. When the morning bustle at the Plaça once again mixes with hikers chatting about the route, you will know a balance has been found — not as a legal formality but as a lived solution for Mallorca.

Read, researched, and newly interpreted for you: Source

Similar News