Palma beach with rows of sunbeds and parasols on the sand near the promenade, illustrating the proposed concession changes

Palma awards beach concessions 2026–2029: millions, rules and sand loss

Palma plans new concessions for 2026–2029: around €6.3 million in annual revenue, stricter rules and a reduction in sunbed density. Who benefits – the city, the operators or the beaches themselves?

Palma awards beach concessions 2026–2029: millions, rules and sand loss

The numbers are striking: Palma expects about €6.3 million annually from the concessions 2026–2029 – more than €4 million of that is projected to come from the rental of sunbeds and parasols. But the central question, which isn’t obvious at first glance, is: Who really benefits – the city treasury, the rental operators, the holidaymakers or the beaches themselves?

What the documents say

The city requests the use of a total of 33,731.40 square meters of beach area. Planned are up to 5,000 sunbeds and 2,500 parasols, which together are expected to occupy about 27,763 m². At the same time, the town hall announces it will reduce the density of loungers – a concession to the sand loss that is particularly visible in the mornings when walking along the paseo: the wind moves the sand, the loungers stand closer together, and kiosks deliver coffee to the promenade.

Other, partly visible changes from the documents:

Color rules: Sunbeds will only be allowed in white or beige from now on – the classic blue of the rental companies will disappear.

Kiosk reallocation: One offering in Cala Major is to be removed; instead a new location in Ciutat Jardí is planned.

Accessibility: Mandatory walkways, accessible toilets and information boards are to be installed – an important but also costly requirement.

Sports zones: Several beach volleyball courts as well as handball and football fields are planned at Playa de Palma; volleyball courts are also planned in Ciutat Jardí. Early in the morning, when the nets are already up and the first trainings start, people will notice this.

Why this is more than just a licensing deal

At first glance the model seems simple: grant a concession, the operator invests, revenue flows. The report assumes that initial investments will pay off within the four years. But this calculation has many unknowns: climate-related sand loss can shift structures, hurricane years or heavy surf can change the beach width, and rising transport or labor costs squeeze margins.

Another aspect often overlooked in the public debate: the administration thus transfers part of the day-to-day maintenance to private providers – but not necessarily the responsibility for coastal protection or long-term upkeep. Who monitors compliance with accessibility, who pays for the walkways if profits don’t materialize? And what does the color rule mean for small local rental businesses for whom investing in new “beige-white” furniture could be an extra burden?

Lower density, but how socially and ecologically sensible?

The planned reduction in sunbed density sounds sensible: more space between spots, less pressure on the sand, more freedom of movement for beachgoers. But the calculation has two sides: fewer sunbeds mean less revenue for operators – this can lead to higher prices per bed or mean only larger companies can afford to continue. Small family businesses could be punished, and the promenade may lose a piece of local diversity.

Added to that is the visual standardization: white or beige may look clean and tidy, but it also takes away some of the local character of the beaches. Some visitors may like that, others will remember the colorful rows that once were part of Mallorca’s image.

Concrete opportunities and solutions

Instead of reducing the discussion to “more revenue vs. fewer sunbeds,” there are concrete steps to link beach economics with coastal protection and social compatibility:

1. Earmark revenues: Lease income should flow directly into beach maintenance, dune restoration and accessible infrastructure – a clear win-win structure.

2. Shorter, staggered contracts: Instead of large four-year contracts, shorter terms with options would be sensible to retain flexibility in the face of climate and market changes.

3. Fair transition support: Support small renters in replacing furniture so that color and equipment rules do not threaten local livelihoods.

4. Monitoring and transparency: Digital counts, regular expert reports on sand levels and a transparent awarding policy would strengthen trust.

5. More space for locals and sports: Mandatory areas for public use and sports fields are good – they must not become privileges for paying sunbathers.

What visitors will notice (and what they won’t)

For the holidaymaker, not everything changes overnight: the white loungers may look cleaner, the new walkways make the path to the sea easier, and the kiosk situation will shift slowly. If you walk along Cala Major in the morning, you smell the salt, hear the seagulls and see where the new rows are being set up – that will be noticed first. What is less visible are the financial shifts behind the scenes and the question of whether the millions truly flow back into the beach.

So there will still be a bit of bureaucracy – and that’s not bad. What matters is that the city not only counts what goes into the coffers, but also what remains on the beaches: sand, space and the small, sometimes untidy magic that makes Mallorca what it is.

Similar News