Palma expects lower revenue from parking fines — City relies on towing and ORA expansion

Palma expects lower revenue from parking fines — City relies on towing and ORA expansion

Key question: Can Palma compensate the decline in fines in a socially acceptable way?

On December 1, 2025 the financial plan made it clear: for 2026 Palma has budgeted around €29 million from penalty notices — about €3.6 million less than the previous year, a drop of roughly eleven percent. At the same time the city anticipates additional income from increased towing of improperly parked vehicles and from expanding the ORA parking zones. And in the middle of the old town, just below the cathedral, two new speed cameras have recently been installed.

It sounds like an internal redistribution: fewer parking ticket revenues, but more money from parking management and towing fees. Yet behind the dry numbers lie questions that are often neglected in budget debates.

Critical analysis: first, it is unclear how sustainable the forecasts for towing fees are. Towing is costly — for residents as well as for small businesses struggling with delivery times. In the short term it boosts revenues, but in the long term frustration grows, which can weaken local businesses. Second, the shift reveals a fiscal problem: municipalities should not rely on fines to close structural revenue gaps. Fines are a sanctioning tool, not a stable source of income.

Third, the public debate often lacks the question of fairness. Who ends up paying the bill? Visitors who park without precise knowledge of ORA boundaries, or locals looking for an evening parking spot for their children? And how much money is really invested in preventive traffic planning versus collecting from parking violators?

What is missing from the budget documents are exact figures on appeals, reimbursements and the administrative costs of managing the parking zones. How many appeals succeed? What are the operating costs for the expanded ORA systems? Without these data the budget calculation remains incomplete.

An everyday scene from Palma: Friday evening in the old town, Passeig del Born fills up, cafés set tables on the pavement, delivery scooters weave between parked cars. Two parking tickets hang from a rearview mirror, a tow truck rumbles at the edge of the plaza — interchangeable, but palpable for the person who urgently needs their car. Such scenes tell more about the measures' effects than any table.

Concrete solutions: Palma should make budget projections more transparent and supplement them with key performance indicators: number of expected tows, average fees, appeal rate, cost per parked hour. An open dashboard approach would help politicians and citizens weigh revenues and side effects.

Instead of reflexively treating towing as a revenue source, a package of measures is more advisable: better signage, digital parking apps with clear boundaries, time‑based parking prices, more short‑term delivery zones and additional night controls. For residents, expanded resident parking permits with reasonable quotas and clear price transparency could be introduced.

In the long run the city should consider earmarking revenues from parking management and fines for traffic calming and alternatives: additional bus services, secure bicycle parking in the old town, better lighting for pedestrian routes — measures that reduce parking pressure while improving quality of life.

What is often missing from public debate is discussion of obstacles to humane traffic management: personnel resources, political priorities and the risk of preferring short‑term revenues over sustainable solutions. Anyone reading the budget must also ask: does the city promote a liveable urban environment or only short‑term revenue gains?

My conclusion: the planned reduction in fine income and the shift to towing and ORA revenues is more than a line in the budget. It is a political decision space that influences traffic behavior, social equity and urban climate. Palma can close the gap — but not at the expense of residents' daily mobility. Transparency, targeted investments and above all a plan that protects people from short‑term fiscal reflexes would be the better way.

If you stroll past the Mercat de l'Olivar on a Saturday and overhear the discussion, you quickly notice: it is not just about budget figures. It is about how Palma lives together — and whether the city administration shapes its revenue plans so that the streets remain not only orderly but also fair.