7,100 Homes: Big Number, Many Questions – What Is Really Slowing the Balearic Plan

7,100 Homes: Big Number, Many Questions – What Is Really Slowing the Balearic Plan

In Palma, the announcement in almost springlike weather felt like a small glimmer of hope: around 7,100 new homes for residents of the Balearic Islands. On the Plaça de Santa Catalina passersby murmured in agreement, a shop assistant at the corner bakery nodded – but the conversations sounded sceptical. A promise is easily made; on the construction site it is decided whether it becomes tangible.

What lies behind the numbers?

The government expects about 5,200 units through an emergency plan against housing shortages and an additional around 1,900 homes primarily to be built in Palma. On paper this looks concrete. Reality, however, has its own pace: finding plots, environmental assessments, building permits and connecting to water, electricity and roads – these are not weekend tasks.

The street view: reasons for scepticism

In front of the Mercat de l'Olivar I met builders and tradespeople. Their tone was sober: high land prices in desirable locations, complicated approval procedures and frequent uncertainty about the legal framework. A colleague summed it up dryly: 'Building affordably is easier said than done.' On the islands, additional costs arise from transport, more expensive building materials and the challenge of insular logistics.

Who is hit by a slow process?

The waiting list is long: young families, caregivers, supermarket cashiers, restaurant staff. Neighbourhoods like Sa Gerreria or La Soledat feel every rent increase, every utility bill. Delays hit those who urgently need affordable housing most – not the planning levels.

What is missing concretely?

Three problem areas stand out: reliable schedules, transparent land valuations and faster approval processes. Added to this are hidden costs – contamination on former industrial sites, earthworks on stony terrain and connection costs for infrastructure. Even if subsidies flow, such items can quickly drive up project costs.

What the public debate overlooks

There is little discussion about alternatives that could act faster: adaptive reuse of vacant buildings, infill near transport hubs, modular construction methods or municipal land banking that reserves plots for social housing. Also rarely on the agenda: clear rules on converting holiday flats so that less housing is permanently lost to tourism.

Concrete proposals for faster impact

A few pragmatic steps could speed things up: an accelerated approval track for projects with a public housing share, standardized land valuations, a central contact point for authority issues and funding packages that cushion not only construction but also earthworks and site servicing costs. On the islands, logistics should also be considered – bulk ordering of materials, regionally organized prefabrication and incentives for more material-efficient building methods.

Looking ahead

The 7,100 are not an empty promise – they are a start. But the time between announcement and moving in is often long. Politics can provide numbers, but success is measured at the construction sites, in the sound of jackhammers and in everyday life in neighbourhoods like La Soledat. If administration, construction companies and communities work openly, quickly and practically together, the plan can bring real relief. Until then there is much to do – and even more to listen: at the market, in the town hall corridor and with the experienced neighbour tradesperson.