Wrecks in the Bay of Pollenca: Municipality pays – but who bears responsibility?

Wrecks in the Bay of Pollenca: Municipality pays – but who bears responsibility?

The Passeig Marítim in Pollenca feels oddly subdued this morning. Between the clinking of coffee cups and the first murmur of the waitstaff there is a sharp smell of old diesel. Three half-sunken boats gleam beneath the calm sea with rusted hulls and flaking paint — a sight that irritates residents, walkers and business owners. The municipality has reacted and set aside 50,000 euros for salvage and securing. The central question remains: Why is the public paying for a problem that should ostensibly be private?

Who is liable when owners cannot be reached?

At first glance the solution seems simple: find the owners and make them pay. In practice it is more complicated. Many smaller boats are poorly or not registered at all, owners change, and insurance often only covers certain damages. Clear identification and digital registers that would allow quick attribution are missing. Until liability is clarified, the wrecks continue to cause damage: visually, ecologically and economically — the latter because tourists avoid the shoreline and beach bars fight for every terrace.

More than an aesthetic problem: oil, marine life, costs

The visible oil sheen on the water brings environmental concerns to the fore. Tiny organisms, fish and birds are sensitive to fuel residues; mussel beds and seagrass meadows in protected bays suffer quickly. Rapid salvage is therefore not only a matter of city marketing but also of nature conservation. At the same time, salvage operations are expensive — 50,000 euros is an urgent budget item, but not a long-term solution. Who will reimburse the costs if the owner cannot later be identified?

What is often missing from the public debate

The public debate usually focuses on costs and filth. Less attention is paid to systemic causes: insufficient berth inspections, lack of mandatory insurance for small yachts, missing reporting requirements, and how ports handle abandoned boats. The role of insurers and shipyards — do they have recourse rights? — is seldom examined in depth. Residents also mention bureaucratic hurdles: permits for salvage take time, while oil and rust continue to cause damage.

Concrete steps to make such scenes rarer

There are practical measures the municipality and port authority could take now: a central, publicly accessible boat registry, mandatory identification, regular berth inspections, and compulsory insurance for environmental damage. In the short term, floating oil booms and quick coordination with specialized diving teams help. In the medium to long term, contracts with salvage companies are worthwhile so they can step in for unresolved cases and then seek recourse.

Opportunities in crisis

The situation also offers a chance: greater transparency can strengthen tourists' trust and reduce costs over time. A clear allocation of responsibilities would prevent the public from repeatedly fronting the bill. Residents could also report damage and upload photos via an app so authorities can respond faster. Such digital tools work in many small towns and would be feasible on Mallorca.

Conclusion: The municipality's 50,000 euros are a necessary immediate measure, but not a permanent solution. Who pays is only the superficial question. Far more important is why the structures remain so open that wrecks can lie around for years in the first place. As long as registration, liability and preventive controls are not improved, the Bay of Pollenca will remain vulnerable to the next rusty reminder — and the smell of diesel will serve as a wake-up call for real reforms.