Four speed cameras in 500 meters: safety or rip-off on the Paseo Marítimo?

Four monitoring points in 500 meters — eyes open on the Paseo Marítimo

If you drive along the Paseo Marítimo these days you notice it immediately: more camera housings, more signs, more glances at the speedometer. Over a stretch of barely 500 meters, a total of four devices have now been installed — two new speed radars near Parc de la Mar in both directions, an older speed camera opposite the port authority and a camera that documents red-light violations at the entrance to the city ring Avenida Gabriel Alomar towards the airport.

I was there yesterday around 5 p.m. Dusk settled over the cathedral, tourists kept taking photos, seagulls cried over the harbor and the trees cast long shadows across the roadway. You can see the signs announcing the monitoring points. And yet: anyone who rolls into the section too fast can quickly end up with a ticket.

What's it really about?

The official answer is: safety. In recent months sidewalks and bike lanes have been significantly widened and crossings reorganized. More space for strolling, more space for cycling — that is indeed necessary. But more people and more movement also mean increased accident risk. The city administration wants to discipline driving behavior and reduce accident numbers. That is understandable. The central question remains: does a density of four fixed controls on such a short stretch actually lead to greater safety — or rather to a feeling of being ripped off?

What is being monitored exactly: speed (the section has a 50 km/h limit), speeding in both directions, a permanent speed camera opposite the port authority and a red-light camera installation at the entrance to Avenida Gabriel Alomar towards the airport. Those who brake late or ignore traffic lights risk not only a fine but also penalty points.

Public perception and overlooked aspects

Reactions are mixed. Some residents are relieved — finally the promenade area is quieter again. Others say: "Four devices in 500 meters is intense." That feeling should not be underestimated. If people believe the state mainly wants to generate revenue, acceptance for sensible measures falls.

So far there has been little discussion about how transparently the city handles accident figures and success measurement. How many accidents occurred before and after installation? Which times are particularly critical? And: are fixed speed cameras the best solution for a city center with high pedestrian and bicycle traffic? Data would help evaluate the measures — and dispel the impression of random or targeted profiteering.

Concretely: opportunities and alternatives

A few pragmatic suggestions that could bring more than pure surveillance:

More transparency: disclosure of accident statistics and regular reports on the effectiveness of the monitoring points. A simple graphic at city hall or online would remove a lot of mistrust.

Temporary adjustments: mobile checks instead of permanent devices at every point — or a trial phase with a clear evaluation after three months.

Physical measures: raised crosswalks, lane narrowings (chicanes) or speed cushions at critical spots force slower driving and at the same time preserve public trust.

Communication and participation: public meetings in Palma, information in several languages, cooperation with shopkeepers and schools. When people understand why something is done, they are more likely to accept it.

Practical tips for drivers and residents

Drive defensively, especially between 8 and 9 a.m. and in the late afternoon — that is when there is a lot of commuter and delivery traffic. Keep an eye on the traffic light at Avenida Gabriel Alomar: the red-light camera is precise. Taking it easy protects children, cyclists and yourself. And anyone who wants can enjoy the cathedral in the evening light during a walk along the water — and take photos without being fined.

In the end it's not only about penalties. It's about children getting to school safely, cyclists not being pushed off the curb and pedestrians crossing the promenade without fear. Four monitoring points in 500 meters can be a means to that end — but only if they are part of a transparent, data-driven concept. Otherwise the feeling remains: eyes open, slow down — and woe to those who brake too late.