Who Acts First? Squatters in Santa Margalida Cause Trouble in Half-Finished Housing Blocks

Half-built block, full problems: A neighborhood seeks answers

Early on Sunday mornings, when the smell of fresh ensaimadas drifts along Calle Pere Estelrich Fuster and a small street dog greets the few passersby, the half-finished building immediately stands out: bare walls, broken windows, construction noise long since fallen silent — and suddenly life again on the floors. What began as a housing project and stalled after the construction company's insolvency has become a scene of occupations. Neighbors ask loudly: Who acts first?

Uncertainty instead of everyday life

For the elderly woman who feeds her pigeons every morning, the change is noticeable. Children who used to play in the small square next door are now collected earlier. Residents report nighttime music, voices, occasional petty deals at the door and even instances of short-term prostitution in an apartment. These incidents are less spectacular than dangerous — but they change daily life.

Dangerous tricks with electricity and water

On site, tangible risks appear: new locks on the main door, improvised wiring that apparently taps electricity, and hoses that lead water into the building. Such makeshift solutions mean increased risk of fire and short circuits; poorly installed systems can cause flooding. The problem is not only criminal or regulatory — it is also a matter of public safety.

The invisible responsibility

The situation raises a series of questions of responsibility that are often overlooked: Who is legally responsible for securing an unfinished property — the insolvent construction company, a bank holding the plot, or the municipality? How quickly can the judiciary act when ownership rights are unclear? And how far may the police and the Guardia Civil intervene when an occupation has already taken place in fact?

Public debate also often lacks focus on two points: first, the role of online platforms that continue to list vacant units as properties for sale, fostering confusion and fraud attempts. Second, the need to think social services in parallel with police measures — many people in occupied flats do not need punishment but perspectives.

Concrete steps instead of helplessness

What could pragmatically help now, without undermining the rule of law: first, a rapid securing of the construction site by the municipality — temporary fences, lighting and transparent access controls. Second, police and judiciary should consider accelerated procedures to act swiftly in clear ownership situations. Third: professional inspections by energy and water providers to eliminate acute hazards.

In parallel, a municipal offer for initial social care should be on the table — a contact hotline, social workers, mediation into emergency shelters or hostel places. And finally a binding obligation for property platforms to verify listings so sales ads do not produce additional legal chaos.

Between pragmatism and principles

The neighborhood demands more presence, clear responsibilities and rapid repairs — but also solutions that endure in the long term. A fence will not solve all problems; a combined strategy will: legal clarity, technical securing, preventive inspections and social services.

When the wind blows from the sea and cafés put their tables outside, a place like Calle Pere Estelrich Fuster should not become a trouble spot. It's about more than order — it's about the sense of security in the quarter. The central question remains: Who will make the first move? The municipality, the owners, the judiciary — or the local community that finally organizes?

The situation is evolving. We will continue to follow and report on new measures or decisions.